AhlulBayt News Agency (ABNA): Two senior military officials from Britain and Germany, in a joint letter warning of what they described as “Russia’s military reorientation toward the West,” urged European citizens to support increased defense expenditures and ongoing efforts to strengthen deterrence capabilities.
The letter, published in The Guardian, was signed by Richard Knighton, Chief of the Defence Staff of the United Kingdom, and General Carsten Breuer, Commander of the German Army. The authors stressed in a cautionary tone that Europe is confronting a “new security reality” and must prepare for the possibility of conflict on the European continent.
Emphasis on Higher Defense Spending
According to the letter, NATO leaders committed during last year’s summit in The Hague to increasing defense expenditures to 5 percent of gross domestic product by 2035. The two commanders stated that achieving this objective would require “difficult choices” in public budgeting and the reprioritization of national spending.
They emphasized that, as senior military authorities of two major European states, they bear responsibility for explaining to the public why governments have initiated what they described as the largest sustained increase in defense spending since the end of the Cold War.
The letter further warned that if Europe appears “weak and divided” in the face of Russia, Moscow could be encouraged to expand the scope of conflict beyond Ukraine.
Acceleration of Militarization Across Europe
In recent months, several European countries have undertaken measures such as reviewing the reintroduction of compulsory military service, expanding defense-industrial production, and organizing joint military training programs. These steps coincide with the allocation of substantial financial resources to defense sectors—funds that could otherwise have been directed toward social services, healthcare, and education.
Supporters of higher military spending argue that strengthening deterrence represents the only viable means of preventing a large-scale conflict in Europe. Critics, however, contend that repeatedly promoting scenarios of an “imminent Russian invasion” without clear evidence contributes to heightened securitization and declining public welfare standards.
Diverging Views on NATO’s Role
While European officials accuse Russia of adopting an increasingly aggressive posture, Moscow has repeatedly stated that it has no intention of attacking NATO member states, arguing instead that the alliance’s eastward expansion constitutes the primary source of tensions.
Some analysts maintain that direct diplomatic engagement aimed at designing a new European security architecture could provide a more sustainable path toward de-escalation than continued increases in military spending.
Public Reaction
Public opinion in several European countries has shown signs of fatigue regarding continued large-scale military assistance to Ukraine and rising defense expenditures. Polling data indicate growing concern among segments of society that reductions in social spending in favor of defense budgets may negatively affect living standards.
Nevertheless, European military and political leaders insist that current conditions require the continent to prepare for multiple security scenarios and reinforce cohesion and deterrence capabilities against potential threats.
Overall, the debate over balancing security requirements with social welfare has emerged as a central issue in both domestic and foreign policy across Europe and is expected to remain a defining political discussion in the months ahead.
**************
End/ 345A
