Recently an American thinker (better to say a dreamer!) in her ridiculous article has claimed that Iran is more dangerous than ISIL terrorist group. But how could anyone possibly claim such funny things?!
In part of her claims, Shoula Romano Horing said: "Replacing the threat of a radical Islamic Sunni caliphate with the threat of a radical Islamic Shiite caliphate is shortsighted and could be a catastrophic strategic mistake to be regretted for generations to come."
I would ask again, how could anyone possibly claim such funny things?! Certainly it could not be anyone except who is serving for Israel and USA ambitions in the Middle East. As it is appear in the history of Shiite's nations, they never were a threat to anyone, instead, they were always under threat from the other groups; like what we can see today in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and the other Shia countries.
Obviously this propaganda against Shia countries is not something new. They know the presence of a strong Shia country, like Iran, would cause stability in the region, and this is not in the favor of Israel.
The Wahhabism is lack of rationality and because of that it could be a proper ground for terrorism. In fact, Wahhabis do not believe in the human intelligence, so their believes are based on the externality of the Sunnah and Quran without any intellection. But Shia ideology is in direct collision with the Sunni Wahhabi doctrine. They do believe in the human mind as a source for understanding the truths of religion.
So with considering this Issue, which is a basic deference between Shia and Sunni doctrine, how Shia ideology can be more dangerous than Wahhabism?!
This is important to say that this so called "American thinker" was born and raised in Israel, so it is not strange of her to have such a funny idea against Iran and Shia countries.
/149