(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - The member of the National Democratic Opposition Parties, Majeed Millad affirmed that there is a deference between the dialogue and the work in the state institutions, explaining the dialogue must be between the various parties for the dialogue to reach to the advanced and modern results to serve people existing them from a crisis or a problem
Millad said the there is a disagreement between the people and the regime and its supporters and this what the whole world knows the reason by tyranny, monopoly of the money, wealth, judiciary, security and even public jobs and all capabilities and the life of the country, pointing out that this is the reason behind the major crisis in Bahrain and this is why calls for a serious and influential dialogue and holds high national and offers the benefit for the people and the nation offer the personal interests.
Millad added that the dialogue is independent and there is not a party that has to decide for the others or impose their agenda or schedule on the other party , and any imposing and totalitarian way of thinking it will reflect a lack of meaning and understanding of the dialogue to the other and translate the reality of the crisis in Bahrain based on control and monopoly in everything and even on what we are discussing and that not to discussed on the table of the dialogue !
Millad added that there is who is thinking in the dialogue that he is the " master of the table" and imposing what he wants from each debate interlocutors , which it is a flawed and very bad and supposed to be moved away with the dialogue from his totalitarian and dictatorship of the management of the country.
Millad affirmed that the disagreement in Bahrain is between the pro-democracy and upholding the dictatorship and the between those who don't the people to have any value and to resolute and between who demands of the people's right to decide, choose and account.
Millad discovered that some behavior is trying to marginalize the other rights in the dialogue and eliminate any voice is a chance to stand one the real crisis in Bahrain and between the mental domination and between the people's demand to their rights which build the stable countries politically, socially and progressively.
/129
Millad said the there is a disagreement between the people and the regime and its supporters and this what the whole world knows the reason by tyranny, monopoly of the money, wealth, judiciary, security and even public jobs and all capabilities and the life of the country, pointing out that this is the reason behind the major crisis in Bahrain and this is why calls for a serious and influential dialogue and holds high national and offers the benefit for the people and the nation offer the personal interests.
Millad added that the dialogue is independent and there is not a party that has to decide for the others or impose their agenda or schedule on the other party , and any imposing and totalitarian way of thinking it will reflect a lack of meaning and understanding of the dialogue to the other and translate the reality of the crisis in Bahrain based on control and monopoly in everything and even on what we are discussing and that not to discussed on the table of the dialogue !
Millad added that there is who is thinking in the dialogue that he is the " master of the table" and imposing what he wants from each debate interlocutors , which it is a flawed and very bad and supposed to be moved away with the dialogue from his totalitarian and dictatorship of the management of the country.
Millad affirmed that the disagreement in Bahrain is between the pro-democracy and upholding the dictatorship and the between those who don't the people to have any value and to resolute and between who demands of the people's right to decide, choose and account.
Millad discovered that some behavior is trying to marginalize the other rights in the dialogue and eliminate any voice is a chance to stand one the real crisis in Bahrain and between the mental domination and between the people's demand to their rights which build the stable countries politically, socially and progressively.
/129