(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - The National Democratic Opposition Parties' team member to dialogue, Majeed Milad, stated that the referendum has been confirmed in the implementation mechanisms of the dialogue outcomes, and the session management mechanisms.
Milad said the last session's record was not signed by the opposition as a participating party for not including the opposition's request to make the authority represented in the dialogue as an essential matter in addition to a fair representation in place of the current unfair representation.
He said, "The Justice Minister took an exclusionary and unbalanced position to further intransigent and aggravate things, the minister went as far as not including discussions that need to be agreed on", adding," observing his statements and behavior from the beginning of the dialogue sessions, you'll find that he has not made one initiative to bring different viewpoints closer together. The Justice Minister is practicing exclusion on the dialogue table by refusing to allow the opposition from putting its points to discussion".
Milad also blamed the minister of impeding agreements with participants by imposing his opinion.
He mentioned that the opposition has insisted on the representation of the authority as a main party in the dialogue since it is no heresy for the ruler to dialogue with the people and a social contract is signed. Milad said no one has the right to cross out any point made by the participating parties as the Justice Minister did.
Milad also mentioned that the Justice Minister attempted to impose his conditions on the dialogue by vetoing to put issues on the dialogue agenda. He added, the responsibility of the mini-team is limited to coordinate the parties' discussion points in the agenda, but it has no right to exclude any points.
/129
Milad said the last session's record was not signed by the opposition as a participating party for not including the opposition's request to make the authority represented in the dialogue as an essential matter in addition to a fair representation in place of the current unfair representation.
He said, "The Justice Minister took an exclusionary and unbalanced position to further intransigent and aggravate things, the minister went as far as not including discussions that need to be agreed on", adding," observing his statements and behavior from the beginning of the dialogue sessions, you'll find that he has not made one initiative to bring different viewpoints closer together. The Justice Minister is practicing exclusion on the dialogue table by refusing to allow the opposition from putting its points to discussion".
Milad also blamed the minister of impeding agreements with participants by imposing his opinion.
He mentioned that the opposition has insisted on the representation of the authority as a main party in the dialogue since it is no heresy for the ruler to dialogue with the people and a social contract is signed. Milad said no one has the right to cross out any point made by the participating parties as the Justice Minister did.
Milad also mentioned that the Justice Minister attempted to impose his conditions on the dialogue by vetoing to put issues on the dialogue agenda. He added, the responsibility of the mini-team is limited to coordinate the parties' discussion points in the agenda, but it has no right to exclude any points.
/129