AhlulBayt News Agency: According to an analyst, the remaining terrorists from the wars in Syria and Iraq are not stronger than Daesh, and this makes it easier for the resistance to clear them out.
An analysis - With the start of the ceasefire between Lebanon and the Israeli regime, many media outlets affiliated with Israel and its Western allies tried to portray Tel Aviv as the victor, a notion that has been widely criticized, especially in light of the events in Syria. The newspaper "Resalat" published an article by "Mohammad Kazem Anbarluie" addressing this issue:
1. Henry Kissinger, the former US Secretary of State during the bloody Vietnam War, once said as a strategist: "The conventional army loses if it does not win. The guerrilla wins if he does not lose." Based on this rule, the US government first accepted a ceasefire and then peace in the Vietnam War, ending a bloody conflict that had involved war crimes, genocide, mass killings, and the slaughter of children and women in Vietnam.
Netanyahu accepted the ceasefire with Hezbollah based on the same principle. According to this principle, Hezbollah emerged victorious, and the Zionist regime suffered a bitter defeat. The Zionist regime will follow the same path in Gaza.
The daily launch of over 200 missiles and drones by Hezbollah towards Haifa, Tel Aviv, and the northern regions of the Occupied Territories showed that Hezbollah is alive, breathing, and can continue to harass the Zionist regime for months with the same capacity.
Liberman, Lapid, and Gantz, in their initial reactions to the ceasefire issue, admitted Israel's defeat. The regime's newspapers also acknowledged this defeat. The sense of victory among the Lebanese people and Hezbollah commanders is an objective reality that cannot be denied.
2- There are seven reasons indicative of Netanyahu accepting the defeat:
A- The missile and drone attacks from southern Lebanon did not stop for a moment.
B- The residents of the northern Occupied Territories, bordering southern Lebanon, did not return to their homes.
C- In the negotiations, the regime could not manipulate the 1701 agreement.
D- The regime suffered increasing casualties in its ground attacks in southern Lebanon.
E- Netanyahu was under intense pressure from the opposition within the government.
F- The calculations regarding the casualties of the war and the impact of targeting commanders were incorrect. Hezbollah quickly compensated for the damages using its self-repair system.
G- Netanyahu did not achieve any of his declared goals.
3- An hour and a half after the ceasefire, a surprise war broke out in northern Syria, specifically in Aleppo. This was not an accidental event. It became clear that the US and the Zionist regime had planned this in advance to compensate for their defeat.
Takfiri groups supported by Turkey, Israel, and some Arab countries have emerged as a dagger in the back. This measure is intended to give the Zionist regime a chance to catch its breath while also stifling Hezbollah. Their goal is to sever the connection between Palestine and Lebanon by striking Syria.
The remaining terrorists from the wars in Syria and Iraq are no stronger than the bloodthirsty criminals of Daesh. They will meet their downfall; it may take time, but it is inevitable. The resistance has proven that it is not a “warmonger,” but it is skilled in the art of war. The emergence of Takfiri malice in northern Syria is a form of military recklessness, and they will soon face severe punishment.
4- The recent political and military developments in West Asia, along with the news of the ceasefire and the evil of terrorists in Syria, mark a turning point. In the CIA, Mossad, and Pentagon kitchens, American and Zionist villains are cooking up a meal to stimulate the new US government's appetite for human rights violations, mass killings, and genocide at first glance.
The outcomes of the game in the nuclear field are clear. The hostility of the IAEA Board of Governors prompted a decisive response from Iran in its new nuclear activities. In Lebanon, the results of the game have been determined. In Syria, the game is ongoing. Meanwhile, the resistance fighters in Gaza continue to rise with vigor. In Iraq, the resistance fighters have not lowered the shutters on their missile and drone operations. And in Yemen, the game remains a 3-0 victory in favor of the resistance.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Pars Today editorial board.
/129
An analysis - With the start of the ceasefire between Lebanon and the Israeli regime, many media outlets affiliated with Israel and its Western allies tried to portray Tel Aviv as the victor, a notion that has been widely criticized, especially in light of the events in Syria. The newspaper "Resalat" published an article by "Mohammad Kazem Anbarluie" addressing this issue:
1. Henry Kissinger, the former US Secretary of State during the bloody Vietnam War, once said as a strategist: "The conventional army loses if it does not win. The guerrilla wins if he does not lose." Based on this rule, the US government first accepted a ceasefire and then peace in the Vietnam War, ending a bloody conflict that had involved war crimes, genocide, mass killings, and the slaughter of children and women in Vietnam.
Netanyahu accepted the ceasefire with Hezbollah based on the same principle. According to this principle, Hezbollah emerged victorious, and the Zionist regime suffered a bitter defeat. The Zionist regime will follow the same path in Gaza.
The daily launch of over 200 missiles and drones by Hezbollah towards Haifa, Tel Aviv, and the northern regions of the Occupied Territories showed that Hezbollah is alive, breathing, and can continue to harass the Zionist regime for months with the same capacity.
Liberman, Lapid, and Gantz, in their initial reactions to the ceasefire issue, admitted Israel's defeat. The regime's newspapers also acknowledged this defeat. The sense of victory among the Lebanese people and Hezbollah commanders is an objective reality that cannot be denied.
2- There are seven reasons indicative of Netanyahu accepting the defeat:
A- The missile and drone attacks from southern Lebanon did not stop for a moment.
B- The residents of the northern Occupied Territories, bordering southern Lebanon, did not return to their homes.
C- In the negotiations, the regime could not manipulate the 1701 agreement.
D- The regime suffered increasing casualties in its ground attacks in southern Lebanon.
E- Netanyahu was under intense pressure from the opposition within the government.
F- The calculations regarding the casualties of the war and the impact of targeting commanders were incorrect. Hezbollah quickly compensated for the damages using its self-repair system.
G- Netanyahu did not achieve any of his declared goals.
3- An hour and a half after the ceasefire, a surprise war broke out in northern Syria, specifically in Aleppo. This was not an accidental event. It became clear that the US and the Zionist regime had planned this in advance to compensate for their defeat.
Takfiri groups supported by Turkey, Israel, and some Arab countries have emerged as a dagger in the back. This measure is intended to give the Zionist regime a chance to catch its breath while also stifling Hezbollah. Their goal is to sever the connection between Palestine and Lebanon by striking Syria.
The remaining terrorists from the wars in Syria and Iraq are no stronger than the bloodthirsty criminals of Daesh. They will meet their downfall; it may take time, but it is inevitable. The resistance has proven that it is not a “warmonger,” but it is skilled in the art of war. The emergence of Takfiri malice in northern Syria is a form of military recklessness, and they will soon face severe punishment.
4- The recent political and military developments in West Asia, along with the news of the ceasefire and the evil of terrorists in Syria, mark a turning point. In the CIA, Mossad, and Pentagon kitchens, American and Zionist villains are cooking up a meal to stimulate the new US government's appetite for human rights violations, mass killings, and genocide at first glance.
The outcomes of the game in the nuclear field are clear. The hostility of the IAEA Board of Governors prompted a decisive response from Iran in its new nuclear activities. In Lebanon, the results of the game have been determined. In Syria, the game is ongoing. Meanwhile, the resistance fighters in Gaza continue to rise with vigor. In Iraq, the resistance fighters have not lowered the shutters on their missile and drone operations. And in Yemen, the game remains a 3-0 victory in favor of the resistance.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Pars Today editorial board.
/129