AhlulBayt News Agency (ABNA): The world scene seems very confusing, a lot of tension and strain stretching and extending across the continents, nonetheless, there are doorways that can lead to temporary solutions or compromises in the worst case scenario.
* The escalating tension between Russia and the western world over Ukraine, and the western military measures there
* The western-eastern tension between China and the western world over Taiwan
* The continuous strain in world politics over the Iranian nuclear file, and Vienna negotiations taking place without any hope looming about a longstanding agreement that could be finalized.
This file is preoccupying the world because of its repercussions and ramifications that could translate all over.
Washington has dragged itself and the whole Western governments into a tough place when it unilaterally and without any reasonable justification withdrew from the agreement with Tehran.
Iran proved credibility and has delivered over the agreement with all its articles and subdivisions.
Contrary to this, the US did not respect its commitments nor delivered its share of conditions in the agreement.
It is Tehran’s right to ask for more guarantees from the world society involved in the negotiations to make sure Washington would not dare to breach its commitments again.
One of the issues at stake during the current negotiations is that Tehran wants a direct and complete lift of American and Western sanctions, meanwhile Washington continues the procrastination policy.
Washington, furthermore, is attempting to add new files to the negotiating table, especially those in link to Tehran’s role in the region, more particularly, those in relation with advancing its rockets arsenal and supporting the resistance movements.
Iran continued to insist in limiting the negotiations to the same issues discussed before without adding any extra point.
What are the anticipated results for the ongoing Vienna negotiations?
It seems clearly that the Americans are not in anyway in a position to hand the Iranians guarantees that former US president Donald Trump’s scenario of pulling out of any reached agreement would not be repeated again. So, the most probable outcome is to reach a temporary agreement that would generally ease the tensions in the region, especially in Iraq and allow for mutual intersection points that would secure a level of stability over different issues.
For its part, Tehran that has never aimed anytime to have a nuclear weapon, has given and is ready to give necessary assurances to this effect, but will never accept to compromise its full sovereign position vis-a-vis other issues that boils down to its basic interests and principles.
Washington, who day and night preaches about real politics and pragmatism, should accept its dwindling position and diminishing role in the region and the world.
This entails a different approach that renders the US accept to abandon its arrogant policy, and strike a settlement that would necessarily recognize the vital interests and role of Iran in its surrounding region. This is the most likely scenario; otherwise, we would be entering another vicious cycle of escalation!
/129
The escalating tension between Russia and the western world over Ukraine, and the western military measures there
The western-eastern tension between China and the western world over Taiwan
The continuous strain in world politics over the Iranian nuclear file, and Vienna negotiations taking place without any hope looming about a longstanding agreement that could be finalized.
This file is preoccupying the world because of its repercussions and ramifications that could translate all over.
Washington has dragged itself and the whole Western governments into a tough place when it unilaterally and without any reasonable justification withdrew from the agreement with Tehran.
Iran proved credibility and has delivered over the agreement with all its articles and subdivisions.
Contrary to this, the US did not respect its commitments nor delivered its share of conditions in the agreement.
It is Tehran’s right to ask for more guarantees from the world society involved in the negotiations to make sure Washington would not dare to breach its commitments again.
One of the issues at stake during the current negotiations is that Tehran wants a direct and complete lift of American and Western sanctions, meanwhile Washington continues the procrastination policy.
Washington, furthermore, is attempting to add new files to the negotiating table, especially those in link to Tehran’s role in the region, more particularly, those in relation with advancing its rockets arsenal and supporting the resistance movements.
Iran continued to insist in limiting the negotiations to the same issues discussed before without adding any extra point.
What are the anticipated results for the ongoing Vienna negotiations?
It seems clearly that the Americans are not in anyway in a position to hand the Iranians guarantees that former US president Donald Trump’s scenario of pulling out of any reached agreement would not be repeated again. So, the most probable outcome is to reach a temporary agreement that would generally ease the tensions in the region, especially in Iraq and allow for mutual intersection points that would secure a level of stability over different issues.
For its part, Tehran that has never aimed anytime to have a nuclear weapon, has given and is ready to give necessary assurances to this effect, but will never accept to compromise its full sovereign position vis-a-vis other issues that boils down to its basic interests and principles.
Washington, who day and night preaches about real politics and pragmatism, should accept its dwindling position and diminishing role in the region and the world.
This entails a different approach that renders the US accept to abandon its arrogant policy, and strike a settlement that would necessarily recognize the vital interests and role of Iran in its surrounding region. This is the most likely scenario; otherwise, we would be entering another vicious cycle of escalation!