The Supreme Leader clearly refers to the non-trustworthiness of the US of A and her vassal allies, i.e. the European Union and her member countries, foremost, Germany, France and the UK. And he is of course right. Western ‘partners’ are almost unilaterally not reliable. Hence, Ayatollah Khamenei’s call for caution, not just for Iran, but for the rest of the world, should be taken seriously.
by Peter Koenig*
On 21 September 2017, the Supreme Leader of the Iranian Islamic Revolution, addressed the head and the members of the Assembly of Experts with kind of a State of the Nation Speech.
He addressed many issues from internal affairs, competing factions within the Islamic Revolution, to external relations – and the economy. He also referred to The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly called the Iran Nuclear Deal, the international agreement on Iran’s nuclear program, reached in Vienna, Austria, on 14 July 2015.
The accord is barely two and half years old and already breached by one of the five main-sponsors, the United States of America. The agreement also refers to the P5+1, meaning the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) – China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States – plus Germany and, of course Iran. The European Union was also part of the agreement in an observer function.
With regard to the JCPOA, Ayatollah Khamenei said “The problem that I had and continue to have with the nuclear negotiations – I have discussed this matter in private and in public with officials – is this: what I am saying is that it was alright to negotiate, there was nothing wrong with negotiating, but those negotiations should have been conducted with care and precision so much so that every short move by us will not be considered as the violation of the JCPOA, while this is not the case for every wrong move that the other side makes! This is wrong! This should not happen. This happens due to lack of trust in and attention to domestic power. This state of affairs happens due to reliance on the other side and on foreign elements.
I will tell you that we should not pin our hopes on foreigners. We should work with the world and I am not opposed to this. Working with the world naturally has certain requirements. We accept these requirements and we shoulder them, however we are not relying on foreigners. This is because our enemies are too many outside the environment of society and the country. There is a front of enemies against us. Well thankfully, we have delivered blows to this front until today. We have defeated it and pushed it back and this will be the case from now on too, but we should know that we are not faced with a single enemy, rather we are faced with a front of enemies.”
Here the Supreme Leader clearly refers to the non-trustworthiness of the US of A and her vassal allies, i.e. the European Union and her member countries, foremost, Germany, France and the UK. And he is of course right. Western ‘partners’ are almost unilaterally not reliable. Washington, especially Trump and his generals, directed by their Deep State handlers, the most prominent of whom is Netanyahu, the Zionist-in-chief and close buddy of Donald Trump, actually so close that he and his cronies decide on US foreign policy, i.e. that Iran is a terror state and has to be ‘neutralized’. This means the nuclear deal negotiated under Obama should be declared nil. Trump has been doing this ever since he ascended to the throne, and even before, during his campaign.
Without the Zionists money (i.e. Wall Street), it may have been difficult for Trump’s dark handlers to catapult him into the Oval Office. In his Tweet-manners, Trump issues threats after absurd threats to Iran, all baseless and outright lies. Wake up, world, for those who still read and believe in Trumps unfounded accusations, be it on Iran, North Korea, Syria or Venezuela – and in fact many more – tweet back, asking warrior Donald to stop his aggressions and seek peace instead. If We, the People, the 99.9%, send him this massive message, he may reconsider sending his “fury and fire” message around the globe, boasting of having his finger on the red nuclear trigger bottom. In reality, he does not want to see himself and his multi-billion fortune going up in flames. Yet, calling these threats ‘kindergarten speek’ would be dangerous, because this madman, much-much madder than the “Rocketman” is totally unpredictable. Just listen to his speech at the UN’s General Assembly of last September and to the senseless utterings of his incompetent UN-delegate, Nikki Haley. Iran knows it. Hence, Ayatollah Khamenei’s call for caution, not just for Iran, but for the rest of the world, should be taken seriously.
Another important point Ayatollah Khamenei makes in his address to the assembly of Experts is on Iran’s economy. “The issue of paying attention to reliance on domestic hands for the sake of solving the problems of the country should turn into a well-established idea in the people's minds. This should be repeated, explained and clarified so many times until it turns into a definite discourse.
We have motivated youth and skilled individuals. We have good producers, good entrepreneurs, good laborers, good farmers, good teachers and good professors. Tasks should be improved by such individuals. It is these individuals who should eliminate the problems of the country. It is also they who should solve economic problems and various other problems related to business.
I am not saying that you should break off your relations with the world. This is not my opinion in any way. From the beginning of the Revolution, I have been among those individuals who insist on establishing relations – relations with the world. In the present time too, I have the same belief, but the point that I want to raise is this: we should not exchange our own powerful natural legs for a foreigners' cane. If we rest on a foreigner's cane instead of standing on our own feet and relying on ourselves, this is wrong.”
This is a clear reference to an “Economy of Resistance” which Iran has embarked on during the past couple of years, including the principles of import substitution, local investments with local currency, local research and development, trading with friends and neighbors, and—especially decoupling from the western dollar economy—which will also be a protection from US imposed sanctions.
These unfounded and totally illegal economic punishments by any standards of international law, should have been lifted after the nuclear accord. This was part of the deal. However, they were not lifted. To the contrary, Washington under Trump and under Netanyahu’s direction, were enforced for no other reason than an absolutely groundless allegation, “Iran is funding terrorism throughout the world.”
For once, the EU and especially the EU leaders, Germany, France and the UK, did not heed Trump’s call for continued sanctions on Iran. To the contrary, especially France and Germany signed bilateral trade and technology exchange agreements with Iran in billions of euros. However, make no mistake; they would not have signed them, if they weren’t on the winning side of the deals. That is predatory capitalism at its worst. That is what the west knows best. The only good thing for Iran about these agreements is that they cement the nuclear deal. Money – billions of dollars – is stronger for the capitalists than Trump’s toothless threats.
However, these deals with the west bear the danger and risks associated with further exposure to the western monetary system, further vulnerability to western threats and sanctions, as all international transactions in western currencies have to transit the US banking system – and can be stopped by a US judge, practically at will. Argentina is a case in point, when in 2014 US District judge, Thomas Griesa in Manhattan, stopped an Argentinian payment to creditors of US$ 500 million, blackmailing Buenos Aires into paying an illegal debt of US$ 1.6 billion to Paul Singer’s predatory Elliott hedge fund. Iran beware of such risks!
Sanctions of the past, nonetheless have left a dent in Iran’s economy. They contributed to inflation and to shortage of foreign goods – which in turn may have been the main reason for last week’s protests that started on 28 December in Iran’s second largest city Mashhad. They then spread across the country and became violent, claiming the life of at least 28 people. They are the most violent protests since those following the 2009 elections, disputing the victory of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They were then said to be officially inspired by opposition candidates Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi, but, in fact, they were largely influenced and promoted by Washington.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on 1 January, according to Reuters, blamed Iran’s foes for fomenting the unrest. Though he didn’t specify who they were, the secretary of Iran’s National Security Council, Ali Shamkhani, said the United States, Britain and Saudi Arabia were behind the riots. He could have added the Zionist regime. There is no doubt, he is right on the dot. The insurrections appear like well-orchestrated western Color Revolutions, or Arab Spring type upheavals, aiming at Regime Change – what else? Similar cases abound throughout the Middle East and the rest of the world.
It is true that neoliberal factions in Iran—the fifth column—is an instrument of the west, a driving force to keep Iran within western influence and especially the western monetary system. Iran’s leadership better be aware: this can be fatal. It will likely bring more economic strangulations as similar dependences have brought to other nations that wanted to preserve their sovereignty instead of bending to the empire. People living under economic hardship can easily be manipulated and mobilized to raise against their government.
Iran has to walk a fine line. The Resistance Economy requires some initial sacrifices and may take time to take on. Nevertheless, eventually it will. Russia has applied it fully, after the 'western sanctions'. President Putin has repeatedly said that these sanctions where the best thing that could have happened to Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union, because they have prompted Russia to revive its agricultural sector, as well as industry and scientific research. He even said so to Ayatollah Khamenei during his last November visit to Iran, suggesting that de-dollarization of Iran’s economy might be a good thing.
Indeed, after Russia went through a couple of economically hard years, she is now on an ascending curve. This is witnessed by two years in a row as the world's largest grain exporter—a renewed, modernized industrial park, largely replacing what Ukraine produced for Russia in the past—and especially, an economy almost completely decoupled from the dollar, working with China and the rest of the SCO on an own currency and trade exchange system, i.e. the petro-yuan, convertible in gold.
Iran could do the same, without bending over to France and Germany (and others in the corrupt EU) for billion dollar / euro trade and technology deals. France is not trustworthy, neither is Germany, they are just out there to take advantage—see Germany’s strangulation of Greece. They are vassals in Washington's pockets. Their ‘leaders’ were put in place by Washington’s propaganda and election manipulations.
My humble advice, if I may, to the Government of Iran for 2018 and beyond:
Continue pursuing the path of “Resistance Economy”, concentrating on "local production for local markets, with local currency and through local state-owned or public banking for the benefit of the national economy". This is one of the principles of "Economy of Resistance". It includes 'import substitution' at a large scale, including using Iran's own science, i.e. 'research and development' (R&D) capacity.
Refrain from seeking trading / business / banking relations with the west – and stay away from the IMF and the World Bank.
Instead focus on the east, on the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and on some of the BRICS countries for external business and trade. The future is definitely in the East, and as a member of the SCO, Iran is already part of the East—the One Belt Initiative (OBI) includes Iran—it is a multi-trillion-dollar (equivalent) program that will dominate economics in the coming centuries.
Use your own currency, not western currencies, especially not the US dollar or its off-shot, the euro. Follow the de-dollarization example of Russia and China, if need be, develop a national cryptocurrency, controlled by the government for external trade, to circumvent the western sanctions—see Venezuela
Finally, be always aware that Washington—masterminded by "the Deep Zion-State"—will never let go. Once they decided on a target—as Ayatollah Khamenei so eloquently says i.e. Iran, Syria, Lebanon—and in Asia, North Korea, they will not let go. No matter whether there is a peace agreement, or whether they have made a promise; nothing, but nothing what Washington says, signs and promises can be trusted. The war in Syria, for example is not ''over’' as Mr. Putin has made believe, when he said Russia will pull out their troops. Just look at the US military base at Al-Tanf in Syria—a US base established fully illegally in Syria. The US was never invited to set foot in Syria. Yet, they not only are enhancing their base, they are also training new Daesh / ISIS terror groups to fight Damascus.
Iran will prevail. Iran is not alone. Iran has a mighty eastern alliance, including Russia and China. Trump and his handlers know it.
*Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a former World Bank staff and worked extensively around the world in the fields of environment and water resources. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for Global Research, ICH, RT, Sputnik, PressTV, The 21st Century (China), TeleSUR, The Vineyard of The Saker Blog, and other internet sites. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe. He is also a co-author of The World Order and Revolution! - Essays from the Resistance.
The views, opinions and positions expressed on Op-Ed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or positions of abna24.com